The Interagency Process: The Need For New Legislation
Abstract
The Interagency Process (IAP), formally established in 1947, is in need of major over-haul. The present process for directing national strategic policy is open for interpretation by the executive branch, which has led to ineffective interagency proceedings, redundancy, and at times conflicting policy. As the nation prepares for the future, it is imperative that the IAP be better codified and formalized to enhance national strength and security. Over the past century and through many conflicts, the role of the U.S. military has changed from being a self-defense force to being a global force focused on a commitment to world peace and democracy. The evolution of the Services into a joint, unified fighting machine is a fascinating study of overcoming personalities, almost fanatical parochialism, and much debate on what is best for the nation. The evolution of democratic principals and a global military presence makes it essential that the leaders of organizations involved in political and military intercourse fully recognize and understand the role of all departments and agencies of the U.S. Government as well as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and multinational organizations. The IAP applied during military contingency operations has been a topic of discussion and debate since its inception. Many studies have discussed the shortfalls of the IAP, and each administration has struggled to recognize and make use of lessons from previous conflicts.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Sep 27, 2003
- Accession Number
- ADA421594
Entities
People
- Edward W. Loxterkamp
- Michael F. Welch
- Richard M. Gomez
Organizations
- National Defense University