A Campaign in the Air

Abstract

Current theory of combat force employment states that air is not a medium for the conduct of a campaign because it is not capable of accomplishing national strategic objectives in the absence of either land or maritime forces. NATO's Operation ALLIED FORCE in 1999 is presented as a counter argument to this theoretical construct. It accomplished national strategic objectives, and the label air campaign is an appropriate term to describe not only the level of objective but the preponderance of force used in the conflict. Other terms either downplay the complexity and level of effort, or fail to accurately describe the event. Beyond the terminology, there are certain conditions that might make an air campaign alone a realistic course of action in the future. Proper consideration of the type of strategic objective, geography, and form of government could aid in the coercion of an adversary without the traditional cost in blood and treasure associated with a ground or maritime campaigns.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 05, 2004
Accession Number
ADA422812

Entities

People

  • Phillip T. Hamilton

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Air Power
  • Aircrafts
  • Bombing
  • Combat Forces
  • Employment
  • Geography
  • Governments
  • Information Operations
  • International Relations
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Theoretical Analysis.