The Total Force Policy and Effective Force

Abstract

This strategy research project concludes that current Department of Defense guidance for rebalancing will reverse the Total Force Policy in terms of its essential contributions to the effectiveness of US armed forces. An inductive analysis grounded in historical precedent indicates that the Total Force Policy supports the overall readiness and decisive use of military force. The Total Force Policy is not a Cold War or post-Vietnam anachronism but an essential ingredient to the successful application of military force. The goal of conducting rapid response operations without any reserve call-up or mobilization prior to commencement of operations will obviate the use of reserve forces within the construct of the typical joint campaign. This will cause a departure from the Total Force Policy's outcome of complementary active and reserve forces and reinstate the vision of redundant roles for reserves forces that predated intervention in Vietnam. Perceived shortfalls in the Total Force Policy come from failure to invest adequately in the readiness of reserve forces not from any intrinsic inability of reserves to support military operations. Instead of altering component roles the Army should focus on achieving a reserve component readiness posture that is on par with active component forces.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 19, 2004
Accession Number
ADA424059

Entities

People

  • Chris Downey

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Tank Missiles
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • History
  • Law
  • Lessons Learned
  • Militia
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Personnel Management
  • Second World War
  • United States
  • Vietnam War
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Strategic Security Studies