Defining a Framework for Reconstruction
Abstract
As the international community, in support of United Nations (UN) sanctioned interventions, finds itself frequently tending to the reconstruction of failed states and the resolution of intrastate conflicts, it has become clear that there is no common definition for reconstruction. In this void commentary often appropriates the language of reparations, which can negatively politicize the actions of intervening vindicators by focusing through a lens of guilt and blame associated with reparations. This paper posits that the international community can use the elements of reparations to develop a common language for reconstruction that avoids the negative while focusing on the potential for positive resolution of intrastate conflicts. This examination of how the elements of classic reparations programs have been used in the past and how America is using a mix of restitution, compensation, satisfaction, and rehabilitation to help build an Iraq that is "stable, just, and prosperous" will begin the process of developing a common understanding of the elements of reconstruction which can then serve as a foundation upon which to build a common language. From a common topical language, a systemic, well-engineered approach with broad applicability can then be developed. (58 refs.)
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 19, 2004
- Accession Number
- ADA424116
Entities
People
- Pamela Y. Willsborgstede
Organizations
- United States Army War College