Airborne and Space-Based Lasers: An Analysis of Technological and Operational Compatibility

Abstract

The Air Force is simultaneously pursuing both the Airborne and Space-Based Laser programs. Believing that these two systems are synergistic, the Air Force has begun the process of advocating both programs, defending their funds, developing the required technology, fielding the weapons, and drafting the doctrine that will make them useful to the operational commands. The purpose of this study is to assess the similarities and differences between these technologies and their technical risks and challenges so the defense establishment can gain a more detailed understanding of the compatibility of the ABL and SBL systems. Once the facts about their compatibility are known, Air Force leadership will be better prepared to make the right decisions about the role of laser weapons in ballistic missile defense. This study hopes to stimulate further debate about how these technologies will influence the security of the United States in the 21st century. There is no debate over the fact that the ABL and SBL are both laser weapons that are capable of performing the same mission of theater ballistic missile defense. Even though these weapons are based on similar configurations inside their respective aerospace vehicles, it is essential to understand that they are not sufficiently compatible to justify the claim that the programs are synergistic. In the case of operational strategies, the extent of compatibility depends strongly upon how the National Command Authority and military actually employ them. Separately, each provides a unique set of strengths and weaknesses, and arguably, each system's weaknesses are significant enough to compromise mission effectiveness. It is fortunate, however, that ABL's weaknesses are compensated by SBL's strengths, and vice versa. It is not surprising, therefore, that a combination of Airborne and Space-Based Lasers working in concert would produce the greatest overall operational effectiveness. (10 refs.)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA425529

Entities

People

  • Kenneth W. Barker

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Sensors
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Airborne Warning And Control System
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Chemical Oxygen Iodine Lasers
  • Control Systems
  • Detection
  • Fire Control Systems
  • Laser Beams
  • Lasers
  • Optomechanics
  • Radar
  • Space Based
  • Systems Engineering
  • Theater Ballistic Missiles
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Ocean-Atmosphere Mesoscale Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Flux Boundary Layers

Technology Areas

  • Directed Energy
  • Space