Grading Theater Engagement Planning

Abstract

The Pentagon institutionalized planning for shaping forces and other assets for peacetime engagement in 1997. It organizes such efforts through theater engagement plans. First, the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) prioritizes its regional objectives in Contingency Planning Guidance. In turn, the Chairman develops a Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan and then formally tasks CINCs and executive agents to produce their respective plans. Overall, the results of shaping have been positive. The fact that the noncombat use of forces is systematically evaluated bodes well. Militaries have always had political and policy applications. Shaping merely recognizes that reality and seeks to exploit it. However, the current system of shaping could do with some revision. An analysis of global shaping activities reveals that regional differentiation is fundamental. Regions, even countries, require unique shaping strategies and programs. However, it seems that the planning process for theater engagement falls short of developing coherent and unique regional strategies. Although regional CINCs have authority over an entire area of responsibility (AOR), they must rely on component commands, the services, and defense agencies to carry out theater engagement plans. One problem in the process is continuing tension among theater commanders, the Joint Staff, and the defense secretariat on policy issues. The solution to this problem would involve requiring OSD to provide more specific guidance at the onset; increasing coordination between DoD and the Department of State; forcing trade-offs between theaters, activities, and strategies; rethinking the planning process with regard to the lost countries -- Russia, Canada, Mexico -- that do not fall into any AOR; requiring the centralized accounting of costs and benefits of shaping; and integrating requirements for either contingencies or other operations into existing force planning efforts. (7 photographs)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2000
Accession Number
ADA426894

Entities

People

  • Barry M. Blechman
  • Kevin P. O'prey
  • Renee Lajoie

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Asia
  • Central Europe
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of State
  • Europe
  • Foreign Policy
  • Governments
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • South Asia
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • United States European Command
  • United States Pacific Command
  • United States Southern Command

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.