Jointness in 1780 Charleston and 1861-1865 Charleston

Abstract

Jointness between army and naval forces has been the focus of many historical studies. Yet, it is often difficult to determine how effective jointness was in accomplishing the required mission. Would the outcome have been the same if the forces operated more jointly? To help resolve this problem, this research focuses on a comparison and analysis between the jointness in the successful siege of Charleston by the British in 1780, and the unsuccessful siege of Charleston by the Union in 1861-1865. This research examines what role jointness played in the successful and failed sieges of Charleston during the two time periods. Charleston's geography and fortifications played a key role in necessitating the need for forces to operate jointly. The effect of battle command and centers of gravity in relation to how forces operate jointly is also discussed. This research serves as a historical case study to help better understand the importance of jointness.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 17, 2004
Accession Number
ADA428686

Entities

People

  • John C. Campbell

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • American Revolution
  • Amphibious Operations
  • Artillery
  • Civil War
  • Firing Rate
  • Geography
  • Military Applications
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • Naval Operations
  • Naval Vessels
  • Navy
  • Terrain
  • Transport Ships
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design