Validation of COAMPS (trademark)/Dust During UAE2

Abstract

Dust forecasting has become important to military operations over the past three decades. Rules of thumb have been the primary resource for forecasting dust. In recent years, algorithms for weather models have been created to produce atmospheric dust concentration forecasts and are now coming into use operationally. The question becomes how good are the models and what causes errors in their forecasts? This study examines the accuracy of the U. S. Navy's Coupled Ocean Atmospheric Mesoscale Model dust module during the United Arab Emirates Unified Aerosol Experiment. The study also attempts to determine what causes any error if present. The primary method to verify the model s aerial coverage accuracy is through equitable threat score. Case studies are then conducted to verify the scores and identify sources of any errors identified. Results indicate the model performs well with respect to sourcing dust plumes. Errors in modeled aerial coverage as compared to real world observations appear to be the result of an inability for the model to properly surface layer. Unconfirmed dust plumes in

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA432675

Entities

People

  • Darren D. Sokol

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Arabia
  • Asia
  • Case Studies
  • Delphi Method
  • Dust Storms
  • Errors
  • Meteorology
  • Military Operations
  • Military Research
  • Observation
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Sea Level
  • Southwest Asia
  • Statistics
  • United Arab Emirates

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Aerosol Science/Aerosol Physics
  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation and International Security