Consensus Based Measurement
Abstract
Developing and scoring situational judgment tests have usually required much expert opinion. A more powerful, broader, and still cost-efficient procedure for creating standards even in ill-defined domains, termed Consensus Based Measurement (CBM), allows examinee responses to be evaluated as deviations from consensus understandings implied by the response distributions of examinee samples. Evaluative data show substantial convergence between expert and examinee based standards and scores, and indicate CBM may be used to score SJTs even when expert judgments are not available to develop scoring rubrics.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Dec 01, 2004
- Accession Number
- ADA432860
Entities
People
- J. Psotka
- P. J. Legree
Organizations
- U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences