Lines on a Map: Regional Orientations and United States Interagency Cooperation

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine one narrowly-focused aspect of United States government interagency cooperation. Many of the departments agencies and bureaus that contribute to our national security divide the globe into regions so that they can better manage their activities around the world. As two prime examples the Department of State has six regions each assigned to an Assistant Secretary of State while the Defense Department has five each under the responsibility of a regional Combatant Commander. It seems obvious that the way each department or agency organizes its global affairs impacts not only how it sees the world and applies programs and policies thereto but also that these divergent regional orientations impact the interactions of the organizations with one other. The paper's thesis is that aligning the regional orientations of our departments agencies and bureaus-beginning with the National Security Council staff State and Defense Departments-would provide a cross-agency synergy that could dramatically outweigh the costs associated with denying each the parochial ability to draw its own lines and boundaries on the map.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 18, 2005
Accession Number
ADA433020

Entities

People

  • John E. Pulliam Jr

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Biomedical
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Combatant Commanders
  • Department Of Defense
  • Department Of Homeland Security
  • Department Of State
  • Governments
  • Interagency Coordination
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Orientation (Direction)
  • South Asia
  • Teamwork
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • United States Government
  • United States Pacific Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.