Beyond Close Air Support. Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership

Abstract

Recent operations in Afghanistan and Iraq have reawakened interest in counterland operations. One battle in particular, Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan, sparked a heated debate between the Air Force and the Army about the conduct of close air support (CAS) and led to new efforts to improve the integration of air power and ground power prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Although these efforts were quite successful, there is growing recognition by both airmen and soldiers that air-ground cooperation is increasingly important and that additional steps must be taken. This report seeks to help the Air Force engage the Army in a constructive dialogue on this issue. In particular, it addresses three policy questions: (1) How should air attack and ground maneuver be integrated? (2) How should the CAS terminal control function be executed? (3) How should ground maneuver/fires and air attack be deconflicted?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA433042

Entities

People

  • Adam Grissom
  • Alan Vick
  • Bruce R. Pirnie
  • David T. Orletsky
  • Karl P. Mueller

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Autonomy
  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Anti-Tank Missiles
  • Artillery
  • Combat Areas
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Geography
  • Guided Bombs
  • Military Force Levels
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Personnel Management
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Strategic Security Studies