U.S. Forward Maritime Strategy and Soviet SSBNs: Optimum Targetting or Escalatory Dilemma

Abstract

As the 1990s approach, there is increasing attention focused on the U.S. force structure required to meet the Soviet strategic threat. Although current events reflect a changing Europe and the viability of the Warsaw Pact is suspect, Soviet strategic forces still constitute a significant threat to our nation. SSBNs in particular, operating from oceanic patrol areas, in port, or from Arctic bastions, provide the Soviets with a capability that is not easily countered. George Lindsey, in his paper "Strategic Stability in the Arctic," argues that NATO SSNs should be used to put pressure on Soviet SSBNs and their Kola Peninsula bases using torpedoes and submarine-launched cruise missiles (SLCMs). He also describes the risk to carrier strike groups operating near Arctic bastions as unacceptable. This paper will address these issues and U.S. strategy options.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 09, 1990
Accession Number
ADA437400

Entities

People

  • Richard O. Fanjoy

Organizations

  • National War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arms Control
  • Attack Submarines
  • Bomber Aircraft
  • Cruise Missiles
  • Detection
  • Deterrence
  • Force Structure
  • Minority Groups
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Shallow Depth
  • Shallow Water
  • Submarine Warfare
  • Submarines
  • Task Forces
  • Ussr
  • Warfare
  • Weapons

Readers

  • European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).
  • Public Financial Management and Budgeting
  • Strategic Security Studies