Decisive Battle and the Global War on Terror

Abstract

With the quick military victories in Afghanistan and Iraq, one might be lulled into thinking that the Global War on Terror will be a quick military fight in accordance with Weigley's American way of war. This study cautions against such views and the desire to employ the concept of decisive battle in this protracted war on terror. This study looks at the historical and theoretical basis for decisive battle and assesses its impacts on the current doctrine of our military. With this foundation, the study then uses limited references to three case studies that share similar characteristics with the Global War on Terror to assess the impact of decisive battle. In light of theory and the hard lessons of selected application, this study examines the relevance of decisive battle to the Global War on Terror. Comparison of the Global War on Terror with historical case studies demonstrates that military power will likely continue to play a prominent role in conflict termination, but the military itself is not enough. The very nature of the Global War on Terror requires more than quick military victory to produce conflict termination.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 26, 2005
Accession Number
ADA437532

Entities

People

  • John D. Cross

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Air Force
  • Civil War
  • Governments
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • Military Applications
  • Military History
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Native Americans
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Political Systems
  • Second World War
  • Treaties
  • Ussr
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Sociology

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Strategic Security Studies