Check Your Privacy Rights at the Front Gate: Consensual Sodomy Regulation in Today's Military Following United States v. Marcum

Abstract

CONCLUSION: The newly created Marcum Test is constitutional and, for most military members, expands their right to engage in private sexual conduct. The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces' rulings in Marcum and Stirewalt imply that the nature of the relationship between two people will form the basis for determining whether their conduct falls under the Lawrence protections. Appellate courts will uphold consensual sodomy convictions when the underlying relationship is unauthorized, while the converse will be true as well. The implications this may have on homosexual conduct has yet to be seen. If the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces continues to follow this relationship-based path, then it would seem consensual homosexual sodomy would be proscribed and within the government's right to prosecute.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 04, 2005
Accession Number
ADA439314

Entities

People

  • Erik C. Coyne

Organizations

  • University of Baltimore

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Criminals
  • Governments
  • Health Services
  • Instructors
  • Law
  • Law Enforcement
  • Military Personnel
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Privacy Rights
  • Standards
  • Supreme Court
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Law

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Theoretical Analysis.