Standards for Advisement, Invocation, and Waiver of Counsel in Military Intelligence Interrogations

Abstract

This thesis addresses the standards for advisement, invocation, and waiver of counsel in military intelligence interrogations in the Global War on Terror. It examines the first part of Attorney General John Ashcroft's question: Are we supposed to read terror suspects their Miranda rights? The question can arise in the context of military intelligence interrogations of persons detained in the Global War on Terror. These detainees may be suspected of violating international or domestic law in addition to being sources of military intelligence. Indeed, the information of value as military intelligence may also be evidence of a crime. Courts and military tribunals can expect to face significant unresolved issues concerning the admissibility and use of admissions and confessions obtained during military intelligence interrogations. An examination of these issues and the standards for advising, respecting, dishonoring, or waiving "Miranda rights" in military intelligence interrogations will, unfortunately, leave little opportunity to address the remaining parts of Mr. Ashcroft's question.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2004
Accession Number
ADA440399

Entities

People

  • Dean L. Whitford

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Civil Rights
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Employment
  • Foreign Relations
  • Human Rights
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Law
  • Military Tribunals
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • Treaties
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Geospatial Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence Analytics
  • Government and Public Administration Law.