Warning and Planning: Learning to Live With Ambiguity

Abstract

The success or failure of military enterprises is often attributed to surprise. Surprise, in turn, is characterized as the result of intelligence failure, specifically, a failure of "warning." This common perception perpetuates the myth that where surprise attacks occur, there is by definition an absence of warning. In fact, one is hard pressed to cite in past decades a military attack that took place with no warning whatsoever--a true "bolt from the blue." Most attacks that have achieved tactical surprise have taken place in an atmosphere of strategic warning, the result of detection and evaluation of some discernible, discrete turn of events that has created or raised tension between attacker and victim. In fact, more ironic is that so much surprise has been achieved in spite warning.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1995
Accession Number
ADA441101

Entities

People

  • Michael J. Mccormick

Organizations

  • National War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Ambiguity
  • Deployment
  • Indicators
  • Information Operations
  • Judgment
  • Learning
  • Mental Processes
  • National Security
  • Personality
  • Psychological Phenomena And Processes
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • Universities
  • War
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Strategic Security Studies