Do We Still Need Ballistic Missiles?

Abstract

Ballistic missiles have become synonymous with America's nuclear deterrent. Always ready at high reliability to provide widespread devastation to any attacker in less than an hour after launch, these weapons presented the ultimate deterrence against the nightmare scenario of the Cold War: a Soviet bolt-out-of-the-blue attack. Why would anyone question whether we should continue to maintain and operate ballistic missiles well into the future? But we no longer expect the kind of attack that ballistic missiles were designed to counter. The unclassified summary of the recent Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) says that the United States will "no longer plan, size or sustain its forces as though Russia presented merely a smaller version of the threat posed by the former Soviet Union".

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA441621

Entities

People

  • Roy C. Pettis Jr.

Organizations

  • National War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Anti-Ballistic Missiles
  • Arms Control
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Explosives
  • Fleet Ballistic Missiles
  • Fusion Weapons
  • Guided Bombs
  • Guided Weapons
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles
  • Nuclear Warheads
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Procurement
  • Strategic Weapons
  • War Colleges
  • Weapon Delivery

Readers

  • Marksmanship and Weaponry.
  • Strategic Security Studies