Restriction of Human Rights in the Military: The Standard of Legitimacy

Abstract

In democratic countries common standards available from international and domestic law, court decisions, scholarly works and other sources have formed on the the contents of individual human rights. There are no common standards, however, on the application of human rights norms in the special military context. This thesis, referring to cases judged by the European Court of Human Rights, the Hungarian Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court, reviews the mainstream European and the American standards as well as the major theories on the treatment of human rights in the military. Based upon that, in order to find some common standards applicable in a modern democracy, the thesis sets legitimate national security aims and examines whether certain human rights restictions in the military are a rational means to attain those aims.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1996
Accession Number
ADA443270

Entities

People

  • Laszlo Kelemen

Organizations

  • The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Human Behavior
  • Human Rights
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Judiciary
  • Law
  • Medical Personnel
  • National Security
  • Political Systems
  • Security
  • Standards
  • Supreme Court
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Law

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Theoretical Analysis.