An Evaluation of Contingency Contracting: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify problems that contingency contracting officers have faced in past contingencies, what problems they are facing in current contingencies, and what problems they are likely to face in the future as the nature of warfare changes, yet they want to increase their efficiency and effectiveness. This effort was accomplished by conducting a historical analysis of contingency contracting from 1775 up to today's Operation Iraqi Freedom, with special emphasis on contingencies occurring between 1990 and 2005. An evaluation of the generations of war was conducted to determine what challenges contingency contracting officers may face in the future. The results of this study revealed four main problem areas that hinder a contingency contracting officer's efficiency and effectiveness. These four areas are (1) Policy, (2) Planning, (3) Organization, and (4) Training. The study then analyzed each of these areas to identify how it was hindering the contingency contracting officer. Recommendations ranged from developing a Joint Contingency Contracting Operations Manual to adopting a new contingency contracting structure based on the Yoder Three-Tier Model.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA443449

Entities

People

  • Carey Luse
  • Christopher Madeline
  • Landon Smith
  • Stephen Starr

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Business Administration
  • Civil War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Iraqi-War
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Students
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Defense Financial Management and Audit.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.