Sanctions: A Viable Tool or an Ineffective Instrument of Foreign Policy?

Abstract

The preponderance of American strategic thinking today is that sanctions do not work as an effective instrument of foreign policy. If one accepts this conventional wisdom, then why has the United States substantially increased its use of sanctions to obtain political objectives? The answer may lie in one's definition of success. This paper examines the use of sanctions and their effectiveness. It also discusses ways in which sanctions can be made more effective, and addresses the usefulness of combining other diplomatic instruments with sanctions. Sanctions are one of a series of instruments that a nation state may use to seek political objectives against a target country. Sanctions are regarded as coercive in nature in that their use is designed to force the target to bend to the will of the nation that imposes the sanctions. In recent history, leading nations and the United Nations have increased the imposition of sanctions. The more recent uses of sanctions include economic sanctions to force Iraq to leave Kuwait, sanctions against Serbia, Haiti, South Africa and, of course, the long standing U.S. embargo against Cuba. One comprehensive examination of the effectiveness of sanctions is found in the 1990 research by Hufbauer, Schott, and Elliott (HSE). These three economists collected data on 116 cases involving the use of sanctions since 1914 and concluded that sanctions were effective in 34% (40 of 116) of the cases studied. The work of HSE is refuted by Robert A. Pape, who declares that only 5 of HSE's 116 cases were successful. What can be done to make sanctions more effective? The consensus view is that multilateral sanctions are more effective than those imposed unilaterally by a single country. Another approach to improving sanctions is the use of targeted sanctions. Although the use of sanctions is clearly not an ideal strategy, the case for employing sanctions is compelling when compared to the alternative of protracted military conflict.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1999
Accession Number
ADA443846

Entities

People

  • John W. Carpenter

Organizations

  • National War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter WMD
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Commerce
  • Diplomacy
  • Economic Sanctions
  • Foreign Aid
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Law
  • National Security
  • Security
  • United Nations
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation and International Security