Combat Exclusion: An Equal Protection Analysis

Abstract

Although women have participated in war throughout America's history, the Womens' Armed Services Integration Act of 1948 excluded service women from combat positions. Some of those exclusions remain in effect today. Advocates of combat exclusion argue that it is the will of the American people to exclude women from combat because women are not physically or psychologically suited to warfare. In addition, there is public concern about unit cohesion, the protection of women, and the continuity of the American family if women are fully integrated into combat positions. Opponents of combat exclusion argue that the policy does not serve a military purpose, but that it is supported by stereotypical notions that have been disproved by recent history. Additionally, the combat exclusion policy does not meet the standards of the intermediate scrutiny test required by the Supreme Court's 1976 decision in Craig v. Boren. A gender-neutral assignment policy which addresses the major societal concerns associated with combat exclusion would pass intermediate scrutiny. Though the conflicting opinions and an equal protection argument against combat exclusion exist, if faced with a challenge, the Supreme Court would probably uphold the current policy because of the great deference that it currently gives to congressional decision making in military matters. That deference, however, is inappropriate when congressional decisions about service members' most basic constitutional rights, such as equal protection, are not based upon military necessity. Therefore, if faced with a challenge to the policy, the Court should not give deference to the military, but should hold that combat exclusion is unconstitutional, and require the adoption of a gender-neutral assignment policy.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1997
Accession Number
ADA445043

Entities

People

  • Stephanie L. Stephens

Organizations

  • The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Civil War
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Employment
  • Families (Human)
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Health Services
  • Law
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military History
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Sexual Assault
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.