Effects of Resolution and Field of View on Various Digital Kneeboard Tasks

Abstract

As display technology moves forward, we are seeing the replacement of paper information in cockpits with digital information. Soon the stack of paper carried on the pilot's knee will be replaced with a digital kneeboard in which the information will not only be displayed, but also manipulated and changed. There are several options for viewing this information, including both a helmet-mounted display (HMD), a small display that rests on the knee (replacing its paper counterpart) or is mounted in the airframe. However, in either case the questions arises as to what are the resolution and field-of-view requirements for optimal performance of various tasks. We examined the readability and task performance using the Antelope Technologies Rugged Handheld 01 display which has a resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA), and the ADR model FG-8000 display with a resolution of 800 x 600 (SVGA). Results are discussed in terms of both FOV and resolution requirements for each of the tasks. Several recommendations are given for both display requirements as well as tests for examining usability of digital kneeboards.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA445074

Entities

People

  • John P. McIntire
  • Nicholas D. Lump
  • Paul R. Havig

Organizations

  • United States Air Force Academy

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Bovids
  • Contracts
  • Digital Information
  • Display Systems
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Helmet Mounted Displays
  • Information Processing
  • Instructions
  • Military Research
  • Operating Systems
  • Technical Information Centers
  • United States

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Educational Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).