Performance-Based Comparison of Low-Light Video Technologies for Night Surveillance

Abstract

Differences in spectral response, pixel size, and noise characteristics between low-light video technologies complicate the direct comparison of field performance for a surveillance application. Commonly measured camera properties such as modulation transfer function and read noise do not directly relate to field performance (e.g., probability of target recognition). In modeling camera field performance based on these measured properties, many assumptions are often made such as constant prereadout gain, signal-independent noise factor, and uniform responsivity. As the imaging task approaches "photon-starved" conditions, the validity of assumptions made by commercially available modeling software becomes questionable%specially for relatively new technologies. Direct comparison of competing technologies can be used to validate modeling results, but such experiments are expensive and time-Consuming, ideally requiring design, fabrication, optimization, and side-by-side testing of complete camera systems under a wide range of potential field conditions.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 03, 2006
Accession Number
ADA445827

Entities

People

  • C. Fischer

Organizations

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Advanced Electronics
  • Air Platforms
  • Sensors

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Absorption Coefficients
  • Buildings And Structures
  • Cameras
  • Cloud Cover
  • Contrast
  • Electrons
  • Equations
  • Focal Planes
  • Illumination
  • Images
  • Light Sources
  • Measurement
  • Night Vision
  • Probability
  • Quantum Efficiency
  • Recognition
  • Surface Roughness

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Image Processing and Computer Vision.