The Korean Armistice: Short Term Truce or Long Term Peace?
Abstract
On July 27, 1953, the United States, China, and North Korea signed the Korean War Armistice Agreement (KAA). However, South Korea refused to sign it, leaving the two Koreas separate and technically still at war to this day. However, to reinforce the United States' commitment to the Republic of Korea (ROK), it signed The Mutual Defense Treaty on 1 October 1953. What influence does a military truce signed by battlefield commanders more than 50 years ago have on the situation on the Korean Peninsula today? The dictionary defines armistice, as "a temporary suspension of hostilities by agreement; a truce." Over the past 52 years, this provisional delay has endured as the primary peace treaty for the region. This paper will address the purpose of the KAA and why this temporary measure has lasted this long. Other questions also are addressed. Has South Korea attempted bilateral discussions with North Korea to develop a lasting peace treaty? Do the political situation and cultural differences between the two Koreas affect the chances of a peace agreement? What conditions must exist for the peace regime process to move ahead, which includes dismantling North Korea's nuclear weapons program and defusing the overwhelming conventional force deployment on both sides of the Demilitarized Zone? How has the United States developed its National Strategic Policy concerning Korea? Does it matter that no representative from South Korea signed the Armistice? Depending on the kind of peace agreement taking shape, what does the peace agreement mean for the ROK-U.S. alliance and the Northeast Asian region? To answer these questions, this paper will review war termination and its application to the KAA.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jan 13, 2006
- Accession Number
- ADA448455
Entities
People
- John M. Sanford
Organizations
- United States Army War College