Interagency Reform for the 21st Century

Abstract

This paper assesses the need for reform of the interagency organization and processes. Like Joint Task Forces interagency organizations are often assembled ad hoc after a crisis has occurred and are initially ineffective in their forming and storming stages. For example conflicting cultures and interests of interagency members inhibit effectiveness. Current post- conflict nation building and reconstruction efforts under Defense Department lead have suffered due to lack of planning and expertise with non-DOD entities with specific expertise sometimes excluded from the process. Following the military mantra of "train as you fight," full-time interagency bodies should be formed and regionally focused. The benefits of such a structure would include unity of effort, unity of command, and the ability to more effectively prioritize and allocate regional resources in support of national interests.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 15, 2006
Accession Number
ADA449390

Entities

People

  • Gregg E. Gross

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Combatant Commanders
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of Homeland Security
  • Department Of State
  • Homeland Security
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • Interagency Coordination
  • International Organizations
  • Law
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Governments
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Defense Technology Research and Development.
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies