Assessing Resource Value and Relationships Between Objectives in Effects-Based Operations

Abstract

The purpose of this research was developing techniques to calculate the value of a resource within the context of campaign objectives, to identify competing objectives, and to identify conflicting objectives to improve a commander?s ability to allocate limited resources. A methodology was developed to express a campaign?s objective hierarchy in terms of a set of desired end states for the campaign?s system of systems. Value theory was used to identify the resource's value in terms of the direct and indirect effects that are produced to achieve the campaign?s objectives. Binding resource constraints within an integer program were used to identify the objectives that competed for the simultaneous use of limited resources. Conflicting objectives were identified using interaction tables. Collectively, the research translated doctrinal, effects-based operational concepts into actionable processes within deliberate planning and crisis action planning horizons.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2006
Accession Number
ADA449610

Entities

People

  • Robert D. Jones

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Complex Systems
  • Defense Systems
  • Electrical Grids
  • Health Care
  • Health Services
  • Hierarchies
  • Mathematical Models
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • Mobile Phones
  • Radio Equipment
  • System Of Systems
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Operations Research
  • Systems Analysis and Design