Incorporating Vision in Defense Transformation
Abstract
The inadequate definition of transformation in the April 2003 Department of Defense Transformation Planning Guidance (TPG) has resulted in military transformation efforts not meeting national security objectives. Transformational concepts have led to emotional reactions throughout their introduction. The author analyzes strategy and transformation since the end of the cold war to show there exists institutional momentum to define transformation in terms of major combat operations and technology as a panacea. A paradox in transformation exists since the US military can only transform to meet the lower level of conflict if it retains its preeminence in major combat. The institutional momentum and paradox can only be solved if doctrine, concepts, and technology are developed in an orderly process and force transformation management is removed from the Pentagon. Analysis of the international security environment shows, though, that national-level transformation is required to end the Department of Defense's role as the first provider for any US crisis. Only through focused vision in Defense transformation can the US succeed in accomplishing future security objectives. This vision starts with a new definition of transformation, implements a transformation process, and bifurcates force and business practice transformation efforts. Through these recommendations, the Department of Defense will set the standard for national-level transformation.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 14, 2006
- Accession Number
- ADA451267
Entities
People
- James R. Sears Jr.
Organizations
- National Defense University