B-Bit VS 11-Bit Softcopy Display for Radiology: Diagnostic Accuracy and Visual Search Efficiency

Abstract

The study compared observer performance and visual search efficiency of radiologists searching for pulmonary nodules on 8-bit vs 11-bit display devices. Scope: Displays from three manufacturers were used at three sites. At each site, 6 radiologists viewed 100 chest images (half with, half without nodules) on both displays. Decisions were recorded as were viewing times and use of window/level. At one site, eye-position was recorded on a sub-set of images to evaluate visual search. Major findings: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance as a function of display bit-depth. There was a slight viewing time advantage with the 11-bit display and the visual search data indicated it was likely due to increased efficiency in first fixating the nodules and shorter time to discriminate them from background. Time to dismiss obviously normal areas was also shorter. There was no difference in use of window/level. Conclusions: There are no significant advantages to using an 11-bit display for interpreting softcopy radiographic images.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2006
Accession Number
ADA453386

Entities

People

  • Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Organizations

  • University of Arizona

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Biomedical Research
  • Detection
  • Dwell Time
  • Efficiency
  • High Resolution
  • Human-Machine Interaction
  • Liquid Crystal Displays
  • Liquid Crystals
  • Medical Personnel
  • Observers
  • Physicians
  • Radiology
  • Standards
  • Tomography
  • X-Ray Computed Tomography

Fields of Study

  • Medicine

Readers

  • Computer Programming and Software Development.
  • Oncology and Biomarker-Based Cancer Detection.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.