U.S. Projection Forces: Requirements, Scenarios, and Options

Abstract

Each year Department of Defense (DoD) funding requests include money for the operation and modernization of U.S. projection forces -- forces that are configured primarily to respond rapidly to Presidential directives for long-distance entry into enemy territory against armed opposition. They include the two divisions of the U.S. Army XVIII Corps (the 82nd Airborne and 101st Airmobile Divisions), the three active Marine divisions and air wings, and parts of the sea-based Navy and Air Force tactical air forces. The issue before the Congress is one of choosing among alternate levels and modernization programs for these forces. Since World War II, most of these forces have been used primarily outside NATO's Central Region in Europe. They are generally thought of in relation to non-European contingencies and, in fact, are likely to be used if the United States were to employ military force rapidly outside Europe. Projection forces are planned, however, to help the United States pursue what has been called a "one-and-one-half war" strategy, namely, the capacity to wage simultaneously a major conflict centered in Europe with the Warsaw Pact and a less demanding military contingency elsewhere. Thus, the size and structure of the projection forces that the Congress is asked to fund derives from the way the DoD estimates they might be used both in Europe and elsewhere. The scenarios DoD employs as analytic devices to size and structure forces are purposely constructed to be very demanding. These scenarios reflect major assumptions that inherently generate high force requirements: (1) that the United States would have little support from allies; (2) that a half war demanding considerable U.S. resources could occur concurrently with a major war centered in Europe; (3) that such a conflict might involve Soviet forces; and (4) that many forces employed in a half war -- particularly ground forces -- could not be redeployed for operations in the major conflict.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1978
Accession Number
ADA455932

Entities

People

  • Dov S. Zakheim
  • Edward Swoboda
  • Fred Haynes
  • James Capra
  • John Ellwood
  • John Shewmaker
  • Marshall Hoyler
  • Patrick Renehan
  • Sara L. Bass

Organizations

  • Congressional Budget Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Airframes
  • Attack Aircraft
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Geography
  • International Relations
  • Military Organizations
  • Naval Operations
  • Navy
  • Tactical Air Support
  • Tanker Aircraft
  • Terrain
  • Transport Aircraft
  • Warfare

Readers

  • European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Public Financial Management and Budgeting