Adoption of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines by Courts-Martial

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the United States sentencing Guidelines to the military sentencing process concludes that the Department of Defense should develop and implement military sentencing guidelines. Due to the experiences of the United States Sentencing Commission, the military should parallel, but not adopt into the federal Guidelines. Federal Guidelines reduce disparity and create uniformity in sentencing. Disparity and outdated sentencing procedures hinder equitable military justice. Inequitable military justice often breeds discontent among servicemembers. Discontent servicemembers become disciplinary problems through disobedience of laws and regulations. Military sentencing guidelines, uniformly applied to all the branches of the armed forces, would promote discipline by reducing sentencing disparity.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1993
Accession Number
ADA456594

Entities

People

  • Criston E. Klotz

Organizations

  • The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Department Of Defense
  • Drug Abuse
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Judiciary
  • Law
  • Marine Corps
  • Military Law
  • Personnel Management
  • Sexual Assault
  • Supreme Court
  • United States
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Economics