The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation

Abstract

Prosodic structure and syntactic structure are not identical; neither are they unrelated. Knowing when and how the two correspond could yield better quality speech synthesis, could aid in the disambiguation of competing syntactic hypotheses in speech understanding, and could lead to a more comprehensive view of human speech processing. In a set of experiments involving 35 pairs of phonetically similar sentences representing seven types of structural contrasts, the perceptual evidence shows that some, but not all, of the pairs can be disambiguated on the basis of prosodic differences. The phonological evidence relates the disambiguation primarily to boundary phenomena, although prominences sometimes play a role. Finally, phonetic analyses describing the attributes of these phonological markers indicate the importance of both absolute and relative measures.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1991
Accession Number
ADA460611

Entities

People

  • Cynthia Fong
  • Mari Ostendorf
  • Patti Price
  • Stefanie Shattuck-hufnagel

Organizations

  • SRI International

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Accuracy
  • Acoustic Measurement
  • Ambiguity
  • Attachment
  • Automated Speech Recognition
  • Automatic
  • Boundaries
  • Contrast
  • Language
  • Linguistics
  • Particles
  • Perception
  • Pilot Studies
  • Production
  • Recognition
  • Syllables

Fields of Study

  • Linguistics

Readers

  • Speech Processing/Speech Recognition.
  • Theoretical Analysis.

Technology Areas

  • AI & ML
  • AI & ML - Machine Translation