A Message Not Yet Sent: Using Strategic Communications to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction Threats

Abstract

The invasion and occupation of Iraq was a strong message sent by the United States to the world. The message was this: "We can take down your country for just about any reason we want to. And if you purport to have weapons of mass destruction, that's a pretty good reason." The United States may never know precisely how effective this message was. It may have convinced some nations, like Libya, to stop their weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. But the United States may never know which states or organizations decided to drop (or not start) a clandestine program as a result of its actions. These actions, by themselves, probably had a good effect in places like Libya, but an optimal strategic communications campaign would have used both words and actions effectively. A strategic communications campaign, while it benefits from a demonstration of the will to back up words with force, should be well-articulated and needs to be repeated over a period of time. Many critics have made the case that the U.S. invasion of Iraq, along with the virtual collapse of international support for the United States prior to the invasion, and some questionable actions by U.S. occupiers, have badly tarnished the image of the United States abroad, especially in the Arab world. The United States turned heads with its message of willingness to use force, but failed utterly in communicating the righteousness of its cause. The critical element missing was a coherent message -- using precise and planned words, together with other instruments of influence, to explain to the world why the United States was worthy of being followed -- and if not followed, at least understood. What was missing was a coherent strategic communications campaign for the United States -- a campaign that needed to be in place long before any invasion. This paper addresses the need for a strategic communications campaign to combat threats of weapons of mass destruction.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 2006
Accession Number
ADA461505

Entities

People

  • Richard H. Estes

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Employment
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Treaties
  • United States European Command
  • United States Strategic Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies