A Case for Decentralized Training

Abstract

The report summarizes how and why the Army moved to a centralized training strategy, where training is planned and controlled by company or higher headquarters. Information is presented on how the Opposing Force (OPFOR) at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) has implemented a decentralized approach to training, where training is planned and executed at the squad or platoon level. This strategy fits well into the OPFOR's decentralized mode of operations. Interviews with 14 OPFOR members provided key insights into what makes decentralized training work and how to use that approach to attain trained Soldiers and leaders. The OPFOR also indicated that both centralized and decentralized training are needed in units as they are complementary modes%of training. Five critical factors essential to ensure a decentralized training program can be successfully implemented are outlined. These are selecting tasks that are appropriate to be trained in a decentralized mode, using qualified trainers, creating an environment conducive to this type of training, developing an assessment system applicable to the decentralized training process, and providing the necessary training support resources. Finally, a proposed strategy for incorporating more decentralized training Army. wide is presented.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA462739

Entities

People

  • James H. Centric
  • Jean L. Dyer
  • Richard L. Wampler

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Army Personnel
  • Army Training
  • Communication Systems
  • Distance Learning
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • Instructors
  • Military Science
  • Personnel Management
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Training
  • Training Devices
  • Training Management
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Agent-Based Social Robotics and Mobile-Assisted Learning in Virtual Environments.
  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation