Successful Theater Missile Defense: Decentral Execution of National Priorities

Abstract

The merger of National, Theater and Cruise missile defense into the Integrated Missile Defense (IMD) architecture is flawed in how it addresses the regional threat posed by theater ballistic missiles. Theater ballistic missiles provide little or no prior warning to launch and have significantly shorter flight times than inter-continental ballistic missiles. The centralized command and control system evolving for the IMD architecture is sub-optimized for theater missile threat characteristics. This paper examines two notional cases of a theater threat to investigate this theory. It is proposed that a centrally developed theater engagement priority list, developed by the entity conducting national missile defense with input from Regional Combatant Commanders, be developed and decentrally executed by Regional Combatant Commanders. This architecture will allow the most efficient response to a theater threat by streamlining the engagement timeline and providing Regional Commanders more latitude in the deployment of forces that are OPCON to them.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 23, 2006
Accession Number
ADA463342

Entities

People

  • David R. Bradley

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Boost Phase
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Command And Control
  • Cruise Missiles
  • Defense Systems
  • Guidance
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Military Operations
  • North Korea
  • South Korea
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Theater Ballistic Missiles
  • Theater Missile Defense
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Weapons

Readers

  • Critical Infrastructure Protection in CBRN and WMD Threats.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Strategic Security Studies

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control