Criticisms Associated with Operation Anaconda: Can Long-Distance Leadership Be Effective?
Abstract
Although Anaconda was successful in achieving its objective of clearing al Qaeda fighters out of the Shah-i-Kot Valley in Afghanistan, the planning and execution errors associated with this operation have provided a wealth of valuable lessons for the United States military. This paper reviews the events of Anaconda and through a detailed analysis, examines the various criticisms it has received. Critical shortfalls associated with CENTCOM's upper-level command and control structure are revealed as the primary source of the confusion and problems surrounding the operation. Particular attention is paid to General Tommy Frank's controversial decision to lead such a large military effort from his Tampa headquarters, 9 1/2 time-zones away from the fight. The author concludes that, despite errors resulting from this decision, it was a viable strategy that offered many inherent benefits. By implementing the lessons learned from General Franks' long-distance leadership, in conjunction with the latest academic recommendations on the subject, valuable guidelines are provided for combatant commanders choosing to lead this country's future conflicts from a headquarters geographically removed from the theater of operation.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Oct 23, 2006
- Accession Number
- ADA463654
Entities
People
- Todd Marzano
Organizations
- Naval War College