Can GWOT Primary Prevention Strategy More Effectively Impede Religious Extremism?
Abstract
Primary prevention, as a medical term, involves taking action to prevent problems from occurring before the onset of symptoms. This concept, when related to the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) in the Middle East, provides insights on the current strategy's effort and effectiveness in staying ahead of religious extremism expansion. Current U.S. focus and expenditure of resources in Iraq and Afghanistan are very expensive and largely a treatment of religious extremism symptoms. To realize cost effective and enduring effects, Middle East primary prevention strategy requires increased emphasis, updated strategic objectives, and implementation analysis. Existing regimes, with their stability, influence, and control over the vast pool of undecided moderate Muslims, are the critical point of strength and vulnerability for both sides. The strategic objective of cauterization, strengthening the states surrounding the country facing an insurgency, is the most valid approach to achieve the end state of isolated pockets of extremism. Diplomacy through principled negotiation, unilateral hegemonic restraint, and a multi-lateral focus of execution will provide the U.S. legitimacy and leverage to realize the efficacy of primary prevention.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 23, 2007
- Accession Number
- ADA468975
Entities
People
- Michael A. Meyers
Organizations
- United States Army War College