The European Union: Measuring Counterterrorism Cooperation. Strategic Forum, Number 229, November 2007

Abstract

The United States and the European Union (EU) are natural partners in the global war on terrorism, but cooperation, although absolutely necessary, is inherently difficult. Primary responsibility for most European counterterrorism policies remains with the separate governments of the 27 EU countries, which has presented coordination problems both within the EU and between the United States and the EU. Asymmetries in capacities and perceived vulnerabilities affect how different member states address counterterrorism. Institutional dynamics not only among the various EU institutions but also between the EU and NATO influence the degree of cooperation as well. The EU has made progress generally as a result of the shock of actual or attempted terrorist attacks. Because Europe has been both a terrorist launch pad and a target in its own right, EU governments tend to focus on preventing terrorist attacks at home rather than fighting terrorists abroad. Nevertheless, over the past 6 years, the United States and the EU -- despite different historical traditions, legal approaches, and capabilities -- have demonstrated an ability to work together. The key is to remain cognizant of the different dimensions (such as military, diplomatic, and financial) related to countering terrorism, as well as the time horizons. The tactical-operational considerations should not impede the long-term strategic goal of delegitimizing terrorism as an instrument for political change. One of the major concerns is that the threat crosses not only borders but also sectors. To date, the major terrorist attacks in Europe have been against soft-target transportation infrastructure, but critical information systems, energy distribution networks, and food supplies also are vulnerable. A multilevel, multisectored approach may represent one answer to this situation. The United States should continue to pursue avenues of cooperation where appropriate at the national, EU, and NATO levels.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA474083

Entities

People

  • David T. Armitage Jr.

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Antiterrorism
  • Counterterrorism
  • European Union
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Information Exchange
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Law
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • Treaties
  • United States

Readers

  • Canine Service Warrior Training Program for Wounded Warriors in the Veterinary Industry, Supported by Donors.
  • Strategic Security Studies