Understanding Mission Essential Competencies as a Work Analysis Method

Abstract

The United States Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Human Effectiveness Directorate, Warfighter Readiness Research Division, in conjunction with the United States Air Force Major Command, Air Combat Command (ACC), has for a number of years pursued a program of research whose focus is the rational integration of networked flying, flying-related, and command and control simulators into current training via Distributed Mission Operations (DMO). The Mission Essential Competency (MEC) work analysis methodology was developed as one facet of this DMO initiative. The MEC approach addresses multiple AFRL/ACC DMO program needs. Among other purposes, MECs enable the determination of training requirements and the appropriate mix of live operation and virtual training media, allow ACC to identify the "value" of DMO and provide justification for funding, and directly enable the construction of air combat simulation scenarios for which validated measures can be developed. While much has already been written about the MECs, one particular unaddressed topic relates to the nature of this effort relative to other work analysis and competency methods. How are MECs different from other methods of work analysis? What outcomes does the MEC approach produce that are unique? Is the MEC process rigorous enough to be considered a work analysis method, as Industrial/Organizational Psychologists understand the terminology and process? To address these questions, the authors take a historical-comparative approach. First, they consider the origin and nature of modern job analysis. Second, they do the same for the competency movement. Third, they review in some detail how MECs are developed and used. Fourth and finally, they discuss MECs as a job analytic technique, including some thoughts on the validity of the method.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA474546

Entities

People

  • Charles M. Colegrove
  • George M. Alliger
  • Michael Garrity
  • Rebecca Beard
  • Winston Bennett Jr.

Organizations

  • Group for Organizational Effectiveness

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Electronic Warfare
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Airborne Warning And Control System
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Control Simulators
  • Control Systems
  • Education
  • Job Analysis
  • Labor Unions
  • Military Research
  • Psychology
  • Simulations
  • Situational Awareness
  • Training
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control