Options for Enhancing the Bomber Force

Abstract

The United States is in the process of modernizing its heavy bombers and weapons stocks so that they can be more useful in conventional conflicts. With those improvements, bombers could fly combat missions directly from the United States while other forces rushed to the region. That capability makes them attractive to a U.S. military that is smaller and based mostly at home. Debate rages about whether the planned bomber force has adequate capabilities and what, if anything, should be done to improve it. This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) paper analyzes the costs and capabilities of the Administration's planned bomber force. It also examines four options that would enhance capability in different ways: making the force larger by buying 20 more B-2s or by keeping all 94 B-52Hs, or improving the force by adding weapons and mission-planning systems or by stockpiling spare parts and equipment at bases near the Persian Gulf and Korea. This analysis was requested by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1995
Accession Number
ADA474741

Entities

People

  • David Mosher

Organizations

  • Congressional Budget Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter IED
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Sensors
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Airframes
  • Anti-Tank Weapons
  • Conventional Warfare
  • Electronic Countermeasures
  • Guided Bombs
  • Inertial Navigation
  • Military Organizations
  • Navigation
  • Precision-Guided Munitions
  • Satellite Guided Weapons
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Strategic Security Studies