Combined Arms Sufficiency Study

Abstract

Combined Arms training is at the core of an officer's education. The Combined Arms Sufficiency Study was initiated to determine in a systematic fashion which subjects should be identified as combined arms subjects and what constitutes a sufficient level of proficiency in these combined arms subjects for lieutenants and captains in the U.S. Army. For the purposes of this study combined arms sufficiency was defined as the knowledge required by the combat, combat support, and combat service support officer that enables him to work effectively with his fellow officers on the modern battlefield. The study was conducted between May and August 1981 at the direction of the Commander, Combined Arms Center. Participants are listed-at Annex A. Methodology is described at Annex F. The study was designed to systematically assess the status of combined arms training at TRADOC schools by obtaining the collective judgment of the branch school commandants on what subjects should be on a combined arms subject list and what constitutes a sufficient level of instruction for each subject. This approach did not allow the use of rigorous statistical techniques for data analysis; nevertheless, the use of a few simple statistical methods and close inspection of the results allowed us to make several useful, if somewhat subjective, observations about the current state of combined arms training. The data collected are consolidated at Annex B, with the exception of those concerning pre-commissioning. The responses on pre-commissioning are discussed in Annex H.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 23, 1981
Accession Number
ADA476737

Entities

People

  • Richard L. Gibson

Organizations

  • United States Army Combined Arms Center

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Availability
  • Battlefields
  • Classification
  • Combat Support
  • Contracts
  • Data Analysis
  • Education
  • Information Operations
  • Inspection
  • Instructions
  • Judgment
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • Monitoring
  • Training
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.