Is There a Dominant, Effective HR Organizational Structure Within Army Medical Treatment Facilities

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a dominant, effective human resource system configuration within the Army Medical Department. The final study sample size (n) included 36 Army medical treatment facilities of various care levels. Independent and dependent variables included patient satisfaction, executive satisfaction, financial performance, and human resource organization type. The data sources for this study were direct queries to individual facility Deputy Commanders for Administration and department chiefs, M2, and the Army Medical Command Management System (CMS). The results of the study revealed an strong prevalence of combined civilian and military human resource (HR) organizations (22 of 36) over separate civilian military human resource organizations (14 of 36). The distribution among survey respondents demonstrated a similar trend with combined HR accounting for 17 of 29 facilities and separate HR accounting for 12 of 29 facilities. However, human resource organization type comparisons failed to yield statistically significant correlations. The study is significant because of the increased pressure for Army medical treatment facilities to prove their competitive equivalence with the civilian sector and there is a growing body of literature that links successful human resource management practices and positive organizational outcomes such as profitability, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 17, 2007
Accession Number
ADA477379

Entities

People

  • Sean T. Lankford

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Databases
  • Department Of Defense
  • Employment
  • Health Care
  • Health Services
  • Human Resources
  • Information Science
  • Information Systems
  • Management Personnel
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Medicine
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Resource Management
  • Therapy

Fields of Study

  • Business

Readers

  • Economics
  • Medical or Health Care Field.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.