Cautious Inference in Collective Classification

Abstract

Collective classification can significantly improve accuracy by exploiting relationships among instances. Although several collective inference procedures have been reported they have not been thoroughly evaluated for their commonalities and differences. We introduce novel generalizations of three existing algorithms that allow such algorithmic and empirical comparisons. Our generalizations permit us to examine how cautiously or aggressively each algorithm exploits intermediate relational data, which can be noisy. We conjecture that cautious approaches that identify and preferentially exploit the more reliable intermediate data should outperform aggressive approaches. We explain why caution is useful and introduce three parameters to control the degree of caution. An empirical evaluation of collective classification algorithms, using two base classifiers on three data sets, supports our conjecture.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA479720

Entities

People

  • David W. Aha
  • Kalyan M. Gupta
  • Luke K. Mcdowell

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Algorithms
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Bayesian Networks
  • Classification
  • Computer Science
  • Data Analysis
  • Data Science
  • Data Sets
  • Information Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Network Science
  • Neural Networks
  • Probability
  • Sampling
  • Test Sets

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Agent-Based Social Robotics and Mobile-Assisted Learning in Virtual Environments.
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • AI & ML
  • AI & ML - Neural Networks