Inefficient Battle Command Results From Unique Commanders Solutions

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the strategic impacts of unit procured Information Technology (IT) in support of Battle Command (BC) and assess the Army major acquisition programs ability to support urgent warfighter needs. Today's selection and use of BC systems is a highly competitive process and extremely leader centric. Unit commanders and their staff outside of the Army's acquisition process, expend unit funds to purchase or create BC systems that meet their specialize approach to BC. Training and information is not available to commanders that describe the impacts of pursuing their own. BC solutions to meet individual preferences Army acquisition programs are at a competitive disadvantage in meeting urgent warfighter needs and therefore users circumvent the system rather than use it. The result is duplicative and inconsistent unit solutions that reduce the effectiveness of BC and the efficiency of resources. Unity of effort is needed to balance warfighter innovation manage the impact of these innovations and the ability to incorporate successful innovations into army acquisition programs for long term sustainment.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 03, 2008
Accession Number
ADA479737

Entities

People

  • Carol A. Wortman

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Army Procurement
  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Command And Control
  • Department Of Defense
  • Education
  • Improvised Explosive Devices
  • Information Systems
  • Iraqi-War
  • Knowledge Management
  • Lessons Learned
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Test Facilities
  • Training
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Enterprise Information Systems Architecture and Joint Command Capability Interoperability Support.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Systems Analysis and Design