U.S. Nuclear Deterrence Policy: Do We Have it Right?

Abstract

The Cold War is over and the Soviet Union is gone. Africa, the South Pacific, and Latin America are nuclear weapon-free zones. China is a most favored trading partner. The United States and Russia have dismantled hundreds of nuclear weapons and decommissioned scores of bombers and submarines. There are numerous international treaties designed to create a world without the threat of nuclear holocaust. So why do states and other actors continue to seek nuclear weapons? Iran is in the media with its thinly veiled efforts to establish itself as a nuclear power. On 6 September 2007, Israel bombed a facility in Syria they believed to be a nuclear threat. North Korea is fattening its international bargaining power with its nuclear program. Pakistan, a nation teetering on the edge of political upheaval, has nuclear missiles. Transnational terrorist organizations relish the thought of acquiring an atomic device. Today's nuclear world is not the one our parent's knew. The main purpose of this paper is to assess U.S. strategy for nuclear deterrence and determine if it is appropriate for application in the post-Cold War world. The analysis examines five strategy documents: the "U.S. National Security Strategy," the "National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction," the "Nuclear Posture Review" (NPR) submitted to Congress in December 2001, and a July 2007 statement by the Secretary of Defense, titled "National Security and Nuclear Weapons: Maintaining Deterrence in the 21st Century." The author compares and contrasts U.S. strategy with alternative points of view from various sources to answer the following questions: What is our nuclear deterrence strategy?; What are the ends, ways, and means of our nuclear deterrence strategy?; Is the U.S. nuclear strategy feasible, acceptable, and suitable?; What are the counterpoints to our nuclear deterrence strategy?; and Does our strategy balance the risk it forces the world and us to assume?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 28, 2008
Accession Number
ADA481521

Entities

People

  • Paul D. Brown

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arms Control Treaties
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Chemical Weapons
  • Cold War
  • Command And Control
  • Department Of Defense
  • Deterrence
  • Employment
  • Fissile Materials
  • Governments
  • National Security
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies