Boumediene v. Bush: Guantanamo Detainees' Right to Habeas Corpus

Abstract

In the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. Bush and Al Odah v. United States, decided June 12, 2008, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 opinion that aliens designated as enemy combatants and detained at the U.S. Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus. The Court also found that 7 of the Military Commissions Act (MCA), which limited judicial review of executive determinations of the petitioners enemy combatant status, did not provide an adequate habeas substitute and therefore acted as an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas. The immediate impact of the Boumediene decision is that detainees at Guantanamo may petition a federal district court for habeas review of the circumstances of their detention. This report summarizes the Boumediene decision and analyzes several of its major implications for the U.S. detention of alien enemy combatants and legislation that limits detainees access to judicial review.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 16, 2008
Accession Number
ADA482788

Entities

People

  • Michael J. Garcia

Organizations

  • Library of Congress

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • District Of Columbia
  • Governments
  • Information Operations
  • Intelligence Collection
  • Law
  • Litigation
  • Military Facilities
  • Military Operations
  • National Security
  • Naval Shore Facilities
  • Public Safety
  • Security
  • Supreme Court
  • United States

Readers

  • Criminal Law