The Trouble with History

Abstract

The distinguished historian Sir Michael Howard once admitted that the past, which he aptly referred to as an "inexhaustible storehouse of events," could be used to "prove anything or its contrary."1 Howard's admission exposes an underlying problem with history that most historians prefer not to acknowledge. The past has indeed served many masters and conflicting purposes over time; its storehouse of events has been used to validate or discredit practically every major theory, precept, or principle. While historians are aware of this, few of them have actually taken the pains to examine what it is about history that permits the past to be used in such contradictory ways. Their reluctance stems, at least in part, from a fundamental concern that the rigorous scrutiny necessary to arrive at the root of the problem might, at the same time, reveal the limits of history--limits that might in turn undermine the purported value that history and, thus, historians bring to education, especially military education. After all, professional military education, more than other forms, strives to impart a certain level of understanding across a broad array of topics in a relatively short period of time.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA485910

Entities

People

  • Antulio J. Echevarria Ii

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Civil War
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • History
  • Military Education
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • Psychology
  • Standards
  • Students
  • Taxonomy
  • Thinking
  • Training
  • Universities
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • History

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.