Propaganda: Can a Word Decide a War?

Abstract

Two years ago, the Lincoln Group, a government contractor, sold unattributed pro-United States stories to Iraqi newspapers in an effort to win the war of ideas and counter negative images of the US-led coalition. The mainstream American press, members of Congress, and other government leaders immediately and loudly condemned these actions as "propaganda" and contrary to the democratic ideals of a free press. A Pentagon investigation, however, found that no laws were broken or policies violated. Nor was the term propaganda ever used by the Lincoln Group or US military in its efforts to apply the information element of power in a war in which the center of gravity (in Clausewitzian terms) is defined as extremist ideology. Which begs the question: How do you fight a battle of ideas with one hand tied behind your back? The ways and means of winning that battle are both informed and ultimately restricted by an innate US culture that struggles with democratic ideals seemingly at odds with the use of information to win over hearts and minds even while the enemy maintains no such inhibitions.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA486008

Entities

People

  • Dennis M. Murphy
  • James F. White

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • Diplomacy
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Information Operations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Propaganda
  • Public Diplomacy
  • Public Opinion
  • Public Policy
  • Second World War
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.