Mandate on the Department of Defense's Contract Award Procedures for Directed Spending Items

Abstract

Section 830 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20081 directed GAO to compare procedures used for awarding noncompetitive defense contracts for new projects pursuant to (1) congressionally directed spending items or congressional earmarks and (2) the special interests of senior executive branch officials. As communicated with your staff in July and August 2008, despite our diligent efforts in exploring various approaches, we have concluded that it is not feasible for us to address the mandate as written. First, we have not found a methodologically sound approach for systematically identifying new projects of special interest to senior executive branch officials. Second, we were unable to apply the definitions of congressionally directed spending items and congressional earmarks recently incorporated in Senate and House Rules, respectively, because of data availability and timing issues. Finally, with these underlying constraints, the comparison of procedures called for in the mandate was not possible. The following sections summarize the approaches we explored and the reasons they were not feasible.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 19, 2008
Accession Number
ADA490278

Entities

People

  • Andrew Sherrill

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Congress
  • Contracts
  • Department Of Defense
  • Electronic Mail
  • Federal Budgets
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • House Of Representatives
  • Law
  • National Security
  • President (United States)
  • Public Administration
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • United States Special Operations Command
  • Websites

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Public Financial Management and Budgeting
  • Theoretical Analysis.