Command and Control of Private Security Contractors: Are They a Viable Force Option for the Combatant Commander?
Abstract
If a Combatant Commander (CCDR) or Joint Force Commander (JFC) were to take command of the approximately 25,000 security contractors in Iraq, a force of such size and capability would prove to be a valuable operational asset. Private Security Contractors (PSCs) are a viable and effective option for direct employment by JFCs or CCDRs. This is significant because contractors could provide another resource, and, as they are seemingly on the battlefield to stay, it is prudent to integrate them into U.S. military operations. This examination focuses only on those PSCs providing armed security services. The framework for analysis is command and control as defined in Joint Publication 3-0, Joint Operations. Assessment of PSC potential for employment is based on the selected aspects of the function as listed in JP 3-0, as well as legality, and legitimacy. The evaluation of these aspects yields two sets of results. The easily quantified aspects of C2 which include systems, risk management, and regional expertise, indicate PSCs are indeed a viable option for direct employment by the CCDR or JFC. A survey of the less tangible aspects of command, control, and public affairs indicates otherwise. It reveals legal and legitimacy issues that limit a commander's effectiveness in commanding and controlling PSCs. Subsequent recommendations which include populating chains of command with officers that are dual-qualified in arms and contracting, or implementing the British concept of sponsored reserve, possess potential for more effective PSC implementation.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Oct 31, 2008
- Accession Number
- ADA494291
Entities
People
- Scott H. Sherard
Organizations
- Naval War College