Army S&T Investment in Interoperability

Abstract

Requirements that Army systems be interoperable add cost to a program from its inception to manufacture and fielding. Program funding estimates from the beginning must highlight the added costs associated with meeting interoperability requirements. Most costs associated with adding interoperability can be identified through program analysis resource management methods already in use by Army PA&E. The S&T specific costs thus isolated form the basis of an evaluation of return on developmental cost invested in interoperability features. The primary quantitative metric for assessing interoperability value-added are the number of interoperable systems produced as a percent of overall Army systems interoperability requirements. This metric can be further defined in terms of interoperable capabilities for joint, multinational and interagency interoperability. A key question is, How much interoperability is enough? This is especially relevant in the multinational arena. How often and how many Army elements require interoperability with infrequent allies? In some cases the more practical solution will be to temporarily rely on tried and proven liaison teams for connectivity. The S&T decision maker must consider the concept of decreasing marginal returns when reflecting on the potential numbers of systems required and the investment in networking all echelons beyond their immediate local area needs. The cost of maintaining interoperable potential is especially salient for software systems. These systems often require regular patches and upgrades to perform as intended. When multiplied across many interface protocols, the maintenance cost can be substantial. This paper discusses the elements of assessing 'bang for bucks' with regard to S&T investment in interoperability. It intends to point to where interoperability investment offers the greatest return and to open our thinking to the possibility that universal interoperability is not a desirable or attainable goal.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA494634

Entities

People

  • Charles L. Barry

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Combat Areas
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Governments
  • Information Exchange
  • Information Systems
  • Interagency Coordination
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Public Administration
  • Radio Equipment
  • Teamwork
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Enterprise Information Systems Architecture and Joint Command Capability Interoperability Support.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Systems Analysis and Design